Sunday, October 11, 2009

Wacky Group Overcomes Threat Together

Forget ice age, this is a new movie detailing the events of yet another wacky group! This unlikely team comprises of the Fox’s family, the Mole’s family, the Badger’s family, and the Rabbit’s family. So how did this group with such a united variety of animal species emerge in the first place? Well, first they do have similar behavioral standards. All four families happen to be diggers; they dig out their houses and live in holes. Secondly, they have a collective identity shared between them because they are neighbors residing in the same hill. Last but not least, (and the factor that perhaps forced them to work together), the 3 families face a common enemy – three farmers’ intent on their destruction. And this sets the platform for their unity against these humans. They hence become interdependent on each other for survival. As seen in the clip above, Mr. Fox asks for their various strengths so that the group may depend on them -

Mole: “I can see in the dark.”
Rabbit: “I’m fast!”
Badger: “Demolitions Expert.”
And Mr. Fox, as the title of the film suggests, is full of wit.

It is through identifying such strengths that tasks may be assigned to each animal, and members can assume their given roles more effectively.

It may seem strange that the rabbits are willing to cooperate with the foxes, even on the grounds of protecting their home, but it is important to consider what the rabbit gains from teaming up with its natural predator. In the movie, the group digs deep underground and creates tunnels leading to each of the farmer's cellar. There they steal food, enough to keep the fox's stomach preoccupied, and enough to keep every animal satisfied and well fed. Hence both the individual's needs and the group's needs are fitted quite nicely and there is no conflict. The rewards gained from being part of the group is having a share of the spoils, with no casualties. At the same time every member with their unique talents helps in the getting of the food, showing their allegiance and commitment to the group.

As with all tight allegiances, groupthink may occur. This unusual team may very well, in future, possess the illusion that they are unstoppable, and that they can always get away with their thefts. A sense of collective rationalisation may also grow amongst them, with the code of survival the primary reason why they continue to steal. The remedy for groupthink however, is near at hand. Although external to the group, the 3 devious farmers serve as devil's advocates, as their presence will continue to ensure the animal group does not get too cocky with themselves. One careless arrogant mistake and the farmers will kill them.

Speaking of which, we should not forget the farmers, who could use some empathy. As it is, they are up against 4 animal families (if we add every single family member there'd be an army, so we are just looking at family type which fits into the optimum group number). If you had a choice, would you join the farmers in their expedition to rid the hill of the 'pests' ? They do need 2 more people to form a group and you could be their next new member!

23 comments:

  1. Hey rachel,

    Totally love this movie. The animals are so cute! But I never thought of the combination of fox, rabbit, mole and badger. Maybe mole and badger do fit, but fox and rabbit? That's a new combination. Isn't fox the natural predator of rabbit? How strange...

    Despite this, it is interesting to see how the team help one another with their strengths and complement each other's weakness. That's what forming a group is all about. :)

    -Chu Yuan

    ReplyDelete
  2. I see the different roles they assume in a group in this movie. I guessed one have to stand out from the rest ( Mr Fox)in order to bring the group to greater heights? If all are to be fantastic then there's not much difference between the members which will probably result in stagnant performance.
    Furthermore, members need to complement each other too, and remind each other of the limitations; how to work towards it etc. Prevents groupthink!

    Looking forward to the movie! =D

    ReplyDelete
  3. HI RACHEL!

    Looks like an interesting movie! I think that the group was actually formed in the first place because they had a common goal/enemy, to rebel against the three farmers’ intent on their destruction, and this is a group characteristic, interdependence. The clip also successfully showed they had a collective identity with the sense of membership of being part of the group.

    cforceleste.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello,

    This could only happen in a cartoon. What about instinct? What is happening in the movie is a metaphor. Just like Gulliver’s Travels out to illustrate the British Upper & Lower house and Animal Farm to illustrate the communist ideology.

    What you have said is a direct mapping of how groups should behave in the face of a common treat, and rightly so, for the sake of survival.

    In most groups, the key obstacle is for each and everyone to 'speak the same language', i.e. to think and act as one. The forming and norming of a group. But most times, that is near impossible, amongst humans, let alone different species of 'animals'? The forming stage is the most challanging as people from different walks of life get together and attempt to work as a team, all having a very different pespective and point of view. So, the group we see in the movie is too good to be true.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey!

    This movie looks really cute. And truly we see how a common goal is able to drive different characters (the different animals) to work together even though they are naturally supposingly "enemies" in the wild where the fox preys on the rabbit. Of course this is a movie, but it clearly shows how we human are able to put our differences aside while we look at the big picture and work together to attain the common goal.

    I suppose this group may be temporal if they do not end up developing interpersonal bonds with each other. Eventually if they have attained this goal as a group, they might disperse and return to their natural roles. However, movies always show characters to have form relationships with each other and end up living harmoniously together even after the group disperse.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Rachel

    I would've thought the animals involved would result in a conflict of character. After all, they were all different types of animals. But, I think the reason their group can work out was because of the common goal they had and the cooperation they needed to ellude the farmers.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is really cool seeing different animals unite to go against a common enemy. Even though the animals might not in reality be allies, this whacky group of animals actually have used their different skills to complement each other on their fight against the farmers.

    I think this movie also talks alot on our relationship in our daily life. For example, from a nerd to let say the quarter back of the Rugby team. If this two people were to share a common goal or a common enemy they would be a whacky unique group to to overcome this obstacle together.

    Real interesting movie by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Didn't watch this movie. But being in a group is a very wonderful thing if you are with the right people as you will then be able to achieve your goals if all of you share the same ultimate goals. We are always engaging in different type of groups in our daily lives. No matter how well we can get along in a group, having groupthink will not be a good thing in the end.

    Breda

    ReplyDelete
  9. HEY HEY HEY!!

    Cute movie! I actually read the book and it was precious seeing the characters come alive on screen.
    Regarding your question about whether i would join the farmers, I want to join whichever group that stands a higher chance of victory! I prefer to belong to a winning group :D But then again I do support wildlife preservation, so I suppose I would not join the farmers even if they are near successful.
    It is strongly apparent how group communication occurs here, and how the group as a whole depends on individual strengths of its members. Every member thus have a certain level of duty to ascribe to.
    However in reality I do not think the foxes are creatures who would initiate a group in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Rachel, I think each animal represents different people in society. And how they can come together despite their differences to overcome problems that affect them all. I do not think groupthink can happen in a group that has very diverse characters, however. Because that diversity already serves as some form of combat. There is no one majority view that everyone has to subscribe or conform to because everyone carries their own opinions. Unless of course the group leader is really influential.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mr Fox is so cute! As with the above post, I agree that the different animals are used by the director to portray different types of characters and personalities of people in society. Having people with different skill sets are what keeps a group, and the society, functioning.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think the biggest similarity they all share is the common enemy. If not, even if they are all diggers, I doubt they would work together especially since the fox is natural predator of the rabbit. But does belonging to a group always ensure survival? Sometimes it is easier to work alone. Because while different group members have their diverse strengths they can contribute to the alliance, they also have their diverse weaknesses which could hinder group goals.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Konnichiwa!

    I agree that groupthink can occur, especially when they start collectively rationalizing their actions. As they work closely together and succeed all the time, they will start to think that they are invinsible.

    ReplyDelete
  14. rocknstone (CHERVIN)>>
    Hey there! Valid point about how such different species of animals might have resulted in conflicts, but don't we have such groups working well together in real life? In reality every group has individuals who are very diverse and different in character and personality, yet when put together they can work well. But of course effort must be put in to understand each other and emphatise with each other.

    ReplyDelete
  15. JUN>>
    Hmmm, i think working as a group has more advantages than working alone. Sure group members might bring in their various weaknesses but we should see them for their strenghs. In fact, one of the factors for effective team work is identifying and utilizing every individual's strength to the group's wellbeing.

    ReplyDelete
  16. hi!

    I didn't watch this movie but i find it a very good way to analyze group communication. In many groups, i believe the most common problem is groupthink. In this case, collective rationalisation is seen. Fortunately, they manage to find solution to it, which is the devil's advocates so they are able to resolve the problem in the end. However, in many other groups, failure to find solutions to groupthink can result in serious consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The irony is there! Fox pairing up with any of their natural preys and vice versa. I think is to further emphasize how the animals are so forced by their circumstances in a way and that is to serve as a wake-up call to the humans of the harms they are inflicting on our environment!

    As much as the whole team should be credited for their cooperation and cohesiveness, fulfilling their assigned task roles and their self-assigned management roles (Mrs Fox as an encourager), Mr Fox should be given the most credit! He was the one who gathered everyone together and helped to highlight what they were good for and assigning them the roles to bring about such a good team together!

    ReplyDelete
  18. The animals are really cute!! AND WACKY! Definitely brought a smile to my face when I watched the video that you posted.

    Your description of the movie is really intereseting too! I especially liked the part where you discussed about the rabbits and the foxes working together. Actually, I think that can only happen in movies. We will almost not see anything like that in real life.

    Anyway, this reminded me of a documentary which I saw on Animal Planet. A lioness actually took care of an orphaned baby deer. Don't you think it's so cool?

    Speaking of groupthink, I am against it. I feel that no matter how a collecive a group is in it's beliefs and such, it should attempt to stay away from groupthink. In a way, it impedes improvements.

    =)Kai Ting

    ReplyDelete
  19. Funny to see how the various animals can identify task roles! How the badger said he was a demolitions expert was hilarious. If the rabbit's goal to help the fox was also to prevent itself from being eaten by the latter, I would think this group's individuals has ulterior motives, which once take over group goals could lead to the individuals leaving the group. So once the rabbit has established another form of survival from the farmers, he might want to disband from the foxes' gang.

    ReplyDelete
  20. KAITING>>
    Hi!! Yes i agree that in reality rabbits and foxes will not work together. But if they have a common goal to work to perhaps they will be forced to cooperate? Your example of how a lioness took care of a baby deer is really adorable! And yes I think that that is really cool!

    ReplyDelete
  21. handwritingsonthewall (CHUYUAN)>>
    Hey there! haha yes i agree it is rather strange for the rabbit and the fox to work together. But should we see the animals as metophorical representations of us humans, and how some humans are more aggressive than others, perhaps we can understand the relationship between the rabbit and the fox a little better. Sometimes diverse people just have to learn to work and trust each other, especially when faced with a mutual threat. In group projects for example, sometimes we meet people who are very intimidating, but we learn to work alongside them and appreciate them along the way.

    ReplyDelete
  22. MONDE>>
    Agreed on how animals may actually represent us humans. However, I think that groupthink may still occur as long as there is a group and they start to bond. Anyway, whether groupthink occurs or not it is better to be aware of it and try to prevent it before it even starts to happen. Like they say, prevention is better than cure! Thanks for your comment :D

    ReplyDelete
  23. clouds (YUJIE)>>
    Hi there! Good point on how having people with different skill sets are what keeps a group, and the society, functioning. I still remember when we did a little personality test during our communications classes, and those groups with alot of people in the same personality category were in trouble of not getting tasks done because there was a lack of people in various task roles. Basically we need people who can contribute to the group in different ways in order for a group to flourish.

    ReplyDelete